In your opinion, are parents required to be
involved in their child's learning? This EducationWeek article focuses on this very issue and tries
to elicit where exactly parents should be involved in their child's education
based upon the funding given to schools by the government sponsored programs
and laws.
Parental involvement in our students' education
will always be relevant and necessary for successful learning to be reinforced.
After reading this article, I do feel that it is essential that
what we teach our students in a classroom is somehow reflected upon in some
way, big or small, at home with interactions occurring between parents and
students. Through this interaction, parents are then able to gauge in how
the students see the learning they are acquiring. They can possibly help
reiterate something that is missed, and help to understand the communal aspect
of student learning and assistance. Though it is our role to educate, inspire,
and elicit creativity in our students, it is a shared occupation that requires
in some way that parents involve themselves in the students' understanding of
concepts covered. This is not to say that parents should be helicopter
parents, hovering over their children, making sure that they understand the
concepts that we as educators are teaching them. It is more essential
that parents understand their roles in facilitating responses to problems and
helping to bridge the gap from what is learned in school to being a guide in
the outside world.
I think it is important that parents are involved.
I say involved because students need ACTIVE support in all areas for the
learning they are internalizing. This is not solely a teacher's
responsibility. If students learn something in school that is relatively
understood as common knowledge, but there is no reinforcement outside of
school, in any capacity, the chances of the student retaining that knowledge is
slim and potentially non-existent. This is how we as educators need to
help facilitate that parents understand their roles in their child's education.
They will not be teaching them per se, that is OUR job. They are
however important roles models in reiterating and maintaining a productive
environment for students to learn outside school.
The big question that the article focuses on is
where and how exactly do we promote this style of learning. It is not
essential that parents see their involvement in their childs' education being completed by
randomly supporting school functions and attending/ participating in "random acts of family
involvement". Though there are various methods proposed, one method
approaches that parents not only involve themselves in school functions for
their children, but approach school work and other arrayed activities at the
home level for their kids. This seems like the most beneficial method for the students.
It provides them with the well-rounded support system that reflects on
their education.
The law that requires schools to mandate parent
involvement also requires compacts to be made specifying exact ways that the
parents will be supplementing and actively participating in their child's
education. They need to be participants in their child's educational upbringing.
Public education districts in Boston, MA have even elected and created "Parent University" since roughly 2009. This program provides inspirational
activity for parents to be engaged in their child's education. It also
provides necessary childcare for parents while they attend these seminars and
"classes" on ways that they can improve their presence and
participation in their child's education. The program has significantly grown
over the past three years in attendance and is widely supported by funding
provided by the government for family-involvement aspects of education.
The
even bigger aspect to this issue is how to draw in parents to be involved if
they are not already. Problems arise
with parents who have strict opinions on how curriculum should be shaped and
how funding should also be spent. Though
we both know as teachers and parents that their involvement is crucial in
student life, it becomes problematic when we cannot focus on a group
understanding of why this is outreach is so important. Some districts have even
hired professionals to be outreach counselors that mainly focus on bringing in
and managing parental involvement in their child’s education. This is not a problem for just one area of educational concentration. This affects all teachers, of all subjects, no matter how effective their teaching may be in a classroom. It is a universal issue that we must design a solution to, in order for students to better gain an understanding of how important the future of education is.
What
do you think? Is it asking too much for
parents to be involved in certain ways in their child’s education? If they are willing to be active participants, how else
can we bring them into the fold collectively without disregarding their
thoughts and opinions? Read the article and sound off with your thoughts and
comments!

I feel like parents need to definitely be a part of a child's education. Parents raise the child for x amount of years before they have to go to school, and then the student only goes to school for half their day. Once the student leaves school it's important that what they learned is not only embraced by their families, but also further developed by their families. My only problem with this is, what exactly can they expect the families to do? Not that being a parent is hard enough and their child's education should be one more chore, but in reality, parents already have a lot to do, especially looking at some single parent families where the parent has three jobs. I don't think it's a bad thing to force parents to get involved, but I just worry about the repercussions of not getting involved. I can't help but feel like it will end up hurting the student, not the uninvolved parent.
ReplyDeleteIt is definitely important for parents to be active in their child's education. Learning doesn't start and end in the classroom, it is a lifelong process. We learn most importantly from our family this is what gives us our Primary discourse, we learn everything else in school. According to James Gee our primary discourse is acquired while our secondary discourse is learned. What we acquire from family is our ability to communicate and use language and without his ability we would never be able to attend school in the first place. States shouldn't have to mandate laws to get parents involved in their children's learning, parents should want to be involved.
ReplyDelete